For years, cryptocurrencies have served as a means of financial escape for millions of Nigerians, an alternative to currency controls, inflation and shallow tax nets. That era will formally end from 2026.
Under the Nigerian Tax Administration Act (NTAA) 2025, the federal government has created a new framework that brings cryptocurrency transactions into the country’s official tax system, requiring all digital asset activity to be linked to a Tax Identification Number (TIN) and National Identification Number (NIN). Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), which also include exchanges and brokers, will be responsible for enforcing compliance, reporting transaction data, and flagging suspicious activity.
This shift is one of Nigeria's most consequential fiscal policy moves in the digital economy, transforming crypto from a largely informal store of value into a measurable, taxable component of national revenue.
From informal wealth to formal revenue
Nigeria is one of the fastest growing crypto markets in the world, with an estimated $92.1 billion transaction volume between July 2024 and June 2025. Yet much of that activity exists outside the tax system, reflecting a broader challenge for the government, which collects less than 10 percent of GDP in taxes, one of the lowest ratios globally.
By bringing crypto into the tax net, authorities are targeting the rapidly growing pool of digital wealth as they pursue ambitious targets of increasing the tax-to-GDP ratio to 18 percent by 2027 and reducing dependence on oil revenues.
Also read: FAAC allocation increases by 55.6% to 3Q2025 as FG disburses N6trn
Rather than attempting to directly monitor blockchain activity, the government is placing the burden on exchanges and other intermediaries. VASPs must register with the tax authorities, conduct strict due diligence on their customers, submit monthly transaction reports, maintain records for at least seven years and report large or unusual transactions to the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU). Penalties for non-compliance include a fine of up to N10 million and possible license revocation.
This approach aligns Nigeria with international standards such as the OECD’s Crypto Asset Reporting Framework, effectively incorporating the country into the global crypto compliance system.
End of anonymity, beginning of accountability
For users, the policy recreates the social contract that made crypto attractive in the first place. Digital assets in Nigeria have long been prized for speed, reach and perception, often overstated anonymity. The new rules make anonymity within centralized platforms largely obsolete.
Crypto educator and platform founder C4B Freedom warned users that exchanges serving Nigerians will be forced to demand TIN or NIN verification before allowing transactions, advising undocumented people to consider transferring funds to self-custody.
“Some people will not be able to access their funds if they cannot provide the required documentation,” he said. He said that although taxation is inevitable, change could be disruptive.
Industry voices say the policy could accelerate the short-term migration toward decentralized exchanges and non-custodial wallets, causing the visible tax base to shrink before it stabilizes.
His comments reflect a widespread concern among retailers that compliance requirements could come suddenly, leaving unprepared users exposed.
Exchanges welcome legalization, but warn of leakage
For exchanges, the framework provides long-term reliability but also introduces operational risks. Ayotunde Alabi, chief executive of Luno Nigeria, said the policy sequence remains a matter of concern.
“This tax structure is a step towards legality, but taxation moving faster than proper licensing creates uncertainty. Who is really within scope when most operators do not have a full VASP license?” Alabi asked.
He warned that uneven enforcement could undermine the policy's objectives.
“This risks pushing users towards informal P2P channels, which defeats the goal of transparency and revenue collection,” he said, adding that regulators should prioritize clarity and coordination along with tax enforcement.
A painful but necessary transition
Others see disruption as part of a broader maturation process. Lagos-based JB, co-founder of Tradepal.ai and convener of the Onchain Festival, described the framework as indispensable for a market of Nigeria’s size.
“All transactions are tied to TIN and NIN, strict KYC, monthly reporting, seven-year records. This formalizes the market and can promote long-term reliability. But the burden of immediate compliance on users and exchanges is heavy,” he said.
They expect behavioral changes in the short term.
“Many will adapt, but expect a short-term shift to decentralized exchanges or self-custody. Nigeria is maturing – painful, but necessary,” JB said.
Crypto and forex trader AmyBlock said the government's intentions are clear. “Crypto is no longer ‘anonymous’ in Nigeria. Your account must be linked to TIN and NIN – the government knows who trades what. With a volume of $92 billion, they want tax revenues to reach 18 percent tax-to-GDP,” he said.
While he described the move as economically rational, he acknowledged that it demanded an adjustment from users. “Smart move for the economy. But traders will have to settle their TIN or move to non-custodial wallets. This also applies to forex,” he said.
Privacy traded for institutional trust
Developers and builders say the law highlights how quickly Nigeria has moved from restrictions to surveillance. Idris, a Web3 developer and DevRel expert, described the change as a double-edged sword.
“From banned to tracked in record time. Your wallet from TIN and NIN to government tax deduction. Welcome to the formality,” he said.
Also read: FAAC allocation increases by 55.6% in 3Q2025 as N6trn distributed
While the framework could attract institutional capital and strengthen market credibility, he said it undermines one of crypto's core appeals.
“It brings legitimacy and institutional trust, but eliminates the privacy that has attracted many people to crypto,” Idris said, predicting new innovation around decentralized and privacy-preserving tools.
Implementation will determine success
Analysts warn that the success of the policy will depend on coordination among regulators. Financial analyst and crypto commentator Rum Offee warned that enforcement without full licensing clarity could have an adverse impact.
“Tax first, full licensing later is disappointing. Only a few exchanges are properly licensed, yet they are pushing monthly reports and TIN/NIN linking from 2026,” Ofie advised.
Without effective coordination between the Securities and Exchange Commission, tax authorities and operators, activity could easily disappear from sight, Ofie said.
“The intention is progressive, but the execution needs better coordination if the government hopes to capture the entire $92 billion market,” the crypto commentator confirmed.
Crypto's new place in Nigeria's economy
By relying on exchanges rather than direct blockchain monitoring, Nigeria is aligning with global standards such as the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, placing the country in the international crypto compliance system.
More fundamentally, the policy redefines the role of crypto in Nigeria – from a parallel financial system to a recognized contributor to public revenues. Whether this provides sustained fiscal benefits or reshapes user behavior towards decentralized options will become clear after 2026.
What is already certain is that crypto is no longer just an escape route in Nigeria. It is becoming part of the state's tax base – and a new frontier in the country's search for revenues beyond oil.
a validity agreement
Exchange operators and analysts broadly agree that the framework indicates long-term validity, but caution that indexing matters. Tax enforcement is approaching faster than full licensing clarity for operators, raising concerns that uneven compliance could drive activity further underground.
Nevertheless, proponents argue that formalization is inevitable if Nigeria wants crypto to mature into a reliable financial asset class. By linking digital transactions to real-world identity, the government is betting that greater transparency will attract institutional capital, reduce fraud and platform failures and ultimately expand financial inclusion at the expense of privacy and informality.
Nigeria’s crypto tax law does more than impose new obligations on traders and exchanges. It redefines the role of crypto in the economy, from a workaround to state control to a contributor to public finances.
Whether the policy provides sustained revenue or merely reshapes the way Nigerians use digital assets will depend on the credibility of enforcement, regulatory coordination, and how quickly users adapt. What is clear is that crypto is no longer just an alternative system in Nigeria, it is becoming part of the financial architecture of the state.
In switching to crypto as a tax base, Nigeria is making a broader statement. In a country looking for revenues beyond oil, even the most decentralized forms of money are no longer beyond reach.
