At a Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council (LEDAC) meeting in December 2025, President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., himself a product of a rich tradition of political dynasties on both sides of his family, called on Congress to prioritize anti-political dynasty measures.
Responding to the President's call, both House Speaker Bozie Dee and Majority Leader Rep. Sandro Marcos fiLed House Bill 6771, also known as the “Anti-Political Dynasty Act”. In the Senate, there were six equivalent bills. fiAlso led.
Is this a sincere call for reform, or is it for show?
The issue is ready for action – and people know it. A Pulse Asia survey conducted on December 12–15 last year showed that 54% of Filipinos support the immediate passage of a law banning political dynasties. Clearly, the public recognizes the negative effects of concentrating political power in just a few families.
The 1987 Constitution envisions a society devoid of political dynasties. Article II Section 26 states: “The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and shall prohibit political nepotism.”fiRequired by law.”
This statement is – “Whatever it may be.”fienforced by law” – this is tricky, and it has theoretically allowed the same old systems and the same old names to spread despite constitutional prohibition. Because people whofiAnd the laws themselves are the product and beneficiaries of dynasties, what would they benefit from creating an enabling law that might lead to the end of the system that has given them power?
Thus, asking how serious our current leaders are in proposing anti-dynasty measures is a valid response.
Our questions must be answered candidly. If there is at least a genuine intention of dismantling the system that has bred complacency and entitlement, then at the very least, we should give these laws a chance.
inclusive governance
Why is anti-dynasty legislation important at this point in our history?
It strengthens democratic institutions by strengthening democratic principles, ensuring equal access to public service, reducing the influence of strong elites, and promoting accountability.
It expands economic opportunities, strengthens local economies, encourages economic decentralization and promotes entrepreneurship. Political dynasties can stifle competition and innovation by promoting businesses owned by family members or friends. Anti-dynasty law could level the playing field fiThe region allows diverse entrepreneurs and businesses to thrive. This, in turn, can lead to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities across different sectors, thereby promoting balanced economic growth.
It empowers marginalized groups and expands the talent pool. Limiting the dominance of political families creates opportunities for underrepresented groups such as women, youth, and minorities to participate in political and economic decision making.
It provides diverse perspectives and innovation, reduces inequality and improves human capital development. A competency-based system motivates skilled individuals to remain and contribute to the economy, reducing brain drain and fostering a strong workforce. It creates a skilled and capable workforce, enabling the country to compete effectively in the global market and adapt to changing economic trends.
Finally, in terms of economy, it attracts foreign investment: inclusive governance and equitable opportunities improve a country's global reputation, making it more attractive to foreign investors.
political advantage
Politically, the anti-dynasty law also has many benefitsfiT.S. Most importantly, it promotes competency. Anti-dynasty laws encourage selection of leaders based on qualityfiQualification, ability and performance rather than family ties, ensuring that capable individuals from diverse backgrounds can contribute to governance and economic development.
Meritocracy prevents the inherent risks of nepotism and favouritism, ensuring that public funds are used for development rather than personal gain, strengthening the economic foundation.
Ultimately, this is good for all Filipinos. Meritocracy provides equal opportunities for individuals to succeed based on their abilities, fostering a dynamic and competitive economy where talent thrives.
Political dynasties are often associated with electoral violence and coercion, which undermine democratic processes. By limiting their influence, we can promote more peaceful and fair elections – an essential foundation for stable governance and sustainable economic growth.
Finally, anti-dynasty measures would increase public trust: the end of political dynasties could restore public confidence in government institutions, leading to greater civic engagement and participation in political and economic activities.
pending legislation
In short, having a real anti-dynasty system in the Philippines would certainly bring about concrete and profound change. Such legislation is necessary to promote inclusive governance and economic participation. Dismantling entrenched power structures that limit opportunities for marginalized groups is essential if we want truly inclusive, responsive governance.
Having said all this, we must now turn our attention to the pending legislation. Do these bills reflect the spirit of what the people want? Our leaders need to be able to reassure us that they are doing this because they want substantive change, not cosmetic change. Only from the details of his proposals can we guess his real intentions.
Filipinos have lived for decades under a system that favors only a few. This has created extraordinary difficulties for us. Now is the time for extraordinary measures.
Victor Andres “Dindo” C. Manhit is President of the Stratbase ADR Institute.